On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:53:50PM +0200, Denis Grelich wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2006 18:16:54 +0200
> "Anselm R. Garbe" <garbeam_AT_wmii.de> wrote:
> > > Maybe the wmii-dock also should have "gravity" to ensure it stays
> > > at the top or bottom of the column? But what if there are two of
> > > them? Also, I
> >
> > Nah, it will behave like a client, except that it would always
> > be visible and that it can't be resized vertically.
>
> Heh. This is even worse than increment handling. Rather make it
> variable-width and -height, like any sane client, and adjust the
> rendering of the icons. Hide some, if they are not visible, break the
> vertical stuff up into rows if neccessary, display little arrows to
> scroll through the dockapps, but please don't make it fixed-width.
Fixed height, but variable width. Fixed height is good,
because you are not forced to see these dockapps in any
view. No need for scrolling complexity.
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Mon May 22 2006 - 19:10:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:06:24 UTC