On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:03:47 -0400
Sean Russell <wmii_AT_ser1.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:45, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> > 2. Use a _bus_ communication channel, which is separate from the
> > usual IXP stuff, for broadcasting events. This way, anyone
> > interested in events can simply connect to this bus and get events
> > at their leisure, without any data loss (the bus listener would be
> > buffered I/O, like a socket, so you do not miss any events).
>
> Boy, I'll bet that I get tarred and feathered for suggesting this...
> but what about dbus? The only significant disadvantage I can see is
> the external dependency it would introduce, which is probably enough
> to keep it from being an option.
You just stole the joke I was going to make ;)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:14:20 UTC