Re: [wmii] [ANN] Rumai 1.0.0

Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:07:41AM -0800, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
>> there was no message_types.rb in my code.
>
> Sorry, message_spec.rb.

Ah, message_spec.rb is just a unit test (or "specification" as the
RSpec people like to say) that I used while developing the real code
in message.rb.

> And I was referring to:
>
> rsp.type.should == Rversion.type
> rsp.version.should == req.version

These are just assertions.

> There was an article which advocated similar message passing style, and
> I strongly disagreed with it. I'd prefer something more idiomatic, like:
>
> want rsp.type == Rversion.type
> want rsp.version == req.Version

Interesting; this seems like the Erlang style of programming where
you have actors who can select messages to operate upon (using
filters like the above code).
Received on Sun Jan 27 2008 - 18:42:31 UTC