Great. And yes, this was a wmii segfault, not a chmod segfault. wmii
crashes on my box.
Thanks guys.
Thomas Gallen wrote:
> Unfortunately Wmii 2 or 3 revisions back didn't respond so gracefully to
> chmod and segfaults (...and I made the poor judgement of finding this
> out at work. :( Ouch.) However, as of the current tip, it's fine and
> just presents me with a permission denied error. If the parent poster is
> using the current tip then I'm sorry to say I wasn't able to duplicate
> this one.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:10:19PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:03:41PM -0400, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
>>
>>> I was just messing around. But generally things should segfault, right?
>>> I only brought it up here because it's a seg fault and not a normal error.
>>>
>> Well, no, they shouldn't segfault, but that has nothing to do with wmii.
>> Presumably you're using GNU chmod, which seems to be what seg faulted.
>>
>> --
>> Kris Maglione
>>
>> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.
>> --Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 23 2009 - 20:32:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 23 2009 - 20:36:11 UTC