Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

From: Hank D <hdonnay_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:58:33 -0500

I'll look at the source. I don't think I'll be able to accomplish
much, but I really want an email client that isn't total ass.

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
> On 3 Apr 2011, at 1:37 pm, D┼żen wrote:
>
>> I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return messages
>> which contain a text/html attachment to the sender? Maybe like this
>> people might learn it someday and trash such shitty MUAs...
>
> I think some mailing lists do this. Some simply drop all attachments but
> means you can't attach patches. Of course, the ML could just drop text/html
> attachments. The big problem is not attachments but mail which does not have
> a plain-text component.
>
> You know, we could all say we're using shitty MUAs because we see the
> rendered HTML rather than the plain-text component. ;) Even HTML-only mail
> can be converted to plain text.
>
> /me mumbles something about "suckless" and "MUA" :D
>
Received on Wed Apr 06 2011 - 05:58:33 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 06 2011 - 06:00:05 CEST