Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

From: Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:00:10 -0400

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom
<thesourceofx_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Why are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs?

dwm is the only window manager that handles tagging properly.

wmii is not a window manager, it's an obscene object lesson in
unhinged kitchen-sink programming.

-- 
# Kurt H Maier

Received on Wed Apr 20 2011 - 17:00:10 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Magnus Leuthner: "[dev] st patch for draw() etc."
Previous message: Nick: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
In reply to: Eitan Goldshtrom: "[dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Next in thread: Andrew Hills: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Andrew Hills: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 20 2011 - 17:12:02 CEST