Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

From: Tom Kazimiers <tom_AT_voodoo-arts.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:57:07 +0200

> (screenshot: http://ompldr.org/vODNuag)

You seem to use a nice (anti aliased) font. Out of curiosity: Can you
please tell me what it is? Thanks.

Cheers,
Tom
Received on Fri Apr 22 2011 - 19:57:07 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Claudio: "Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches"
Previous message: Andrew Hills: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
In reply to: Suraj Kurapati: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Next in thread: Suraj Kurapati: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"
Reply: Suraj Kurapati: "Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 22 2011 - 20:00:05 CEST