RE: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact

From: Jente Hidskes <jthidskes_AT_outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:01:57 +0100

I meant that once we would resize clients too much (which causes the crash) we could simply 'hide' them 'underneath' the stack, like the deck layout does. Could you elaborate on the nstack approach? I'm not fully understanding where you're coming from.

Also, I'm not sure what typewriter font I'm using? Could be some Outlook thing, but over here I'm reading Times New Roman.

> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:48:21 +0000
> Subject: Re: [dev] [DWM] Patch: stack mfact
> From: raphlalou_AT_gmail.com
> To: dev_AT_suckless.org
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jente Hidskes <jthidskes_AT_outlook.com> wrote:
> > Or, we could incorporate another patch of mine if we are getting too many
> > clients in the stack: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/deck
>
> I don't really understand the point of combining a patch that makes clients
> in the stack different sizes with a patch that only allows one client in the
> stack. Having an nstack (similar to nmaster but for the stack) would make
> more sense.
>
> Something more like http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/clientspertag (but not
> exactly like it either).
>
>
>
> --
> ______________
> RaphaŽl Proust
>
                                               
Received on Thu Mar 28 2013 - 14:01:57 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Mar 28 2013 - 14:12:05 CET