On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Kurt H Maier <karmaflux_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> it wasn't a leak.
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> the free list grew without bound
>
> what
>
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
>
Leaked memory is allocated but unreachable, the result of failing to
free a dead block. In this case, the fault was increasing the size of
a memory pool without the pool manager's knowledge. It happened to
result in the same failure that a memory leak would cause, but the two
fault types are still distinct.
-- Steve McKayReceived on Thu Feb 24 2011 - 06:59:57 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 24 2011 - 07:12:02 CET