Re: [dev] [st] bold as bright (again)

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:42:18 +0200

http://lolcathost.org/b/stcolors.png
http://lolcathost.org/b/stcolors2.png

Both works for me

On 01/04/2011, at 15:29, Stefan Mark <mark_AT_unserver.de> wrote:

> On 01.04.2011 15:06, pancake wrote:
>> Oh.. i was about to push the patch...until I realized the original thread.
>>
> Yay! ... Awwww
>
>> Check those pictures:
>
> I get a 404 on both, but i tried myself (with my irssi settings the
> display is correct). The 256colors2.pl is strange, i dont know what the
> first two for loops are for, the script works fine on both terms when
> these are commented out (and the output looks the same as in xterm
> without the comments).
>
>> You may see some other differences... and the missuse of bright when bold
>> sometimes hurts my eyes... but some programs just are hard to read without
>> it...
>
> Yep, i know. Switching by hotkey might be a solution.
>
>> So, before adding this patch I would prefer some more discussion to make st
>> more usable. and less eye-harmful.
>
> Ok, let me know if i could help. Anyway, i think most of the mentioned
> problems do not affect this patch directly.
>
> greets
> stefan
>
Received on Fri Apr 01 2011 - 15:42:18 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 15:48:02 CEST