Re: [dev] wmii as a prepatched dwm (Was: segfault)

From: Connor Lane Smith <>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:03:58 +0100


On 27 June 2011 08:13, a.l.e <> wrote:
> this is the main reason why i prefer wmii to dwm: i don't want to keep track
> of versions of dwm and of the patches i have applied.

I can't help but think that the solution would be not to apply
patches. You don't really need to.

> at least: dynamic tags

'Dynamic' is a rather overloaded term, but dwm's tagging *is*
dynamic... Moreso than wmii.

Received on Mon Jun 27 2011 - 13:03:58 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 27 2011 - 13:12:03 CEST