Re: [dev] less(1) replacement?

From: isabella parakiss <izaberina_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 03:47:52 +0200

On 8/27/17, Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 23:59:27 +0200
> isabella parakiss <izaberina_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Isabella,
>
>> https://i.imgur.com/79U7mcO.png
>> side by side screenshot against less
>> your face looks hideous
>
> he did not mean the interface, but the code itself. And I personally
> concur that this rather belongs to the uglier realm of bash-scripts.
> Please refrain from personal insults.
>
> It's impressive how it has been made, but I'm sure "native" solutions
> in C or other compiled languages should be preferred. Paging is not a
> too difficult thing to solve, if I may make this statement.
>
> With best regards
>
> Laslo
>
> --
> Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
>
>


cool, let me just rewrite it in c++
or in javascript and then create a native solution with electron


name 3 reasons why compiled languages should be preferred, but of course
performance can't be in your list


also it's funny that you talk about personal insults after your rape threats
go fuck a cactus
Received on Sun Aug 27 2017 - 03:47:52 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Aug 27 2017 - 04:00:06 CEST