Re: [dev] less(1) replacement?

From: Stéphane Aulery <>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 02:41:42 +0200

Le 27/08/2017 à 19:29, a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 05:27:24PM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
>> My idea is how to reconcile the implementation of programs and a kernel
>> that is a multiplexer like plan9 with a language and a sound compilation
>> environment like that of Oberon.
> Once you have a nice working kernel with a vulkan stack and GPUs drivers, we'll
> talk about it again. In the meantime, good luck and fair winds.
> But really, you should try ada and rust, they "solved" probably all what you
> are talking about, already.
> Even rust has a less worse syntax than go, as far as I can recall. Don't forget
> to have a look at ada, a very strongly backed language... oh! and I was told
> something about mathematical proof integration with the D language.
> You also have the ML family, the "beauty" of "functional" languages:
> formal proof software is usually written using them, and lucky you, one of them
> has object orientation straight in the syntax, ocaml. I expect the addition of
> "aspect programming" straight in the syntax too!
> A good start would be to write your own compiler (not optimizing first). I
> suggest a c++17 compiler could be a good warm up, what do you think of that?

That one feels the anger through irony. Thanks anyway.

Stéphane Aulery
Received on Mon Aug 28 2017 - 02:41:42 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 28 2017 - 02:48:14 CEST