On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
> > sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have time and will to
> > try and comprehend all the new DEFGEOM stuff (and neither I see a
> > reason).
> >
> > Hence I vote -1 for all post 1122 releases.
>
> agree completely (not using +1 notation to avoid confusion).
>
> I'm still using two/more instances of 4.7 everywhere. Imho, the only
> clean way of directly supporting multihead would be to put everything
> currently in globals into a struct, and run multiple instances of the WM
> in separate data structures, with a few well-defined crossing points
> (such as: move client to the list of another screen)
>
> Regards,
> Mate
>
And the new changes have prompted me to switch to xmonad. I liked the
old, simpler dwm. But you can't please everybody.
-- Jeremy O'Brien aka neutral_insomniac GPG key: 0xB1140FDB http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/jeremy.asc Linux newo 2.6.24-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1400MHz
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:37:28 UTC