Re: [dwm] dwm's future

From: Enno Boland (Gottox) <>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:43:23 +0200

Hi There!
> 3. A third idea for legacy support is, that I tend to add a
> compile-time option or a specific Rule extension that let's you set to
> reparent all clients or certain clients which are broken such as
> Mathematica or various Swing apps, though I'm not absolutely sure how
> likely that is. Somehow my inner feelings are against it, because it's
> not a dwm problem and those broken apps should be fixed.
I believe that a compile time switch in rules is unneccessary. If we
want to support these b0rken apps, why not reparent any client?

Received on Sun Apr 26 2009 - 16:43:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 26 2009 - 16:48:04 UTC