Re: [wmii] sh flame with Uriel

From: Hans Hohenfeld <hans353_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:49:25 +0100

On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:18:53 +0100, Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

>> I actually liked wmi, design- and usage-wise. The above statement is
>> 100% subjective.
> All statements are subjective, big deal.

Yes and that include statements about using sh or rc or whatever...

> wmi was shit; [...]

I (_subjectively_) liked wmi10, but wmii is much better (_subjectively_),
so what...

> [...] if you don't agree, go back to use it and don't waste
> our time with this discussion.

sh is much better than rc (_subjectively_) and if you don't agree, go back
to use
it and don't waste our time with this stupid flame...

> uriel

Hans
Received on Wed Mar 01 2006 - 20:44:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:28 UTC