On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:45:01PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> I still think you got it wrong, there are no multiple ws anymore,
> except in the mind of the user and as keybindings (maybe) that set
> the current set of visible tags.
Can we agree that we use different terminology? Because I can
fully follow what you proposed. You got it wrong what I mean
with ws. With ws I meant cached layout information of a specific
tag in use, though I can agree that creating such cached ws on
tag definition makes rarely sense, they can only created or
reused by request to keep the memory usage minimal.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Fri Mar 03 2006 - 13:21:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:37 UTC