> Can we agree that we use different terminology? Because I can
> fully follow what you proposed. You got it wrong what I mean
> with ws. With ws I meant cached layout information of a specific
> tag in use, though I can agree that creating such cached ws on
> tag definition makes rarely sense, they can only created or
> reused by request to keep the memory usage minimal.
Ok, yes, we agree now, I understood that you wanted to create the
cached layout on tag creation, which made no sense to me(because some
times you will never use it, and because you need on-the fly creation
anyway for ones that have multiple tags.
uriel
Received on Fri Mar 03 2006 - 13:26:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:37 UTC