Re: [wmii] snap: 20060309

From: Anselm R. Garbe <garbeam_AT_wmii.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 21:54:14 +0100

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:44:39PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> You obviously can't read, the differences between the mechanism I
> proposed and awk, it is like comparing a fly with a 747 and claiming
> that a fly requires many tons of steel.
>
> Of course you demonstrate considerable ignorance about awk, as pattern
> matching is just a small part of awk, and even then, awk is just a few
> thousand lines of code. If you need more than one hundred lines of
> code to split a string and match with basic globing operations, you
> are certainly delusional.

Define a rule grammar, write a rule matcher which has a char ** or char
* as result and provide us the code. If you do it in lesser than
100 lines we can think about your mechanism. Note that you have
to parse the rules from a char buffer with proper length. I
don't care if you want to keep the information in rule structs
after writes to /pattern or in the char buffer. Just do it in
lesser than 100 lines to show us, that you're not delusional.

Thanks. Otherwise simply shut up.

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Thu Mar 09 2006 - 21:54:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:55 UTC