On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:44:39PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> You obviously can't read, the differences between the mechanism I
> proposed and awk, it is like comparing a fly with a 747 and claiming
> that a fly requires many tons of steel.
>
> Of course you demonstrate considerable ignorance about awk, as pattern
> matching is just a small part of awk, and even then, awk is just a few
> thousand lines of code. If you need more than one hundred lines of
> code to split a string and match with basic globing operations, you
> are certainly delusional.
Define a rule grammar, write a rule matcher which has a char ** or char
* as result and provide us the code. If you do it in lesser than
100 lines we can think about your mechanism. Note that you have
to parse the rules from a char buffer with proper length. I
don't care if you want to keep the information in rule structs
after writes to /pattern or in the char buffer. Just do it in
lesser than 100 lines to show us, that you're not delusional.
Thanks. Otherwise simply shut up.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Thu Mar 09 2006 - 21:54:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:55 UTC