On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:56:57PM -0700, iv_AT_c-66-229-172-60.hsd1.ca.comcast.net wrote:
> I think that naming something and then having to remember it is like adding
> more management to what you already have and multiple tags would like be a
> little redundant, a "code" window, and a "program window" and a "debug"
> window give little hints as to what is happening and each time you use them
> its like naming variables in your life. Its a waste of time, because I
> think a single name is sufficient. In addition you will only know if you
> have selected the correct window regardless of tag name by looking at the
> window, not by the name. Just like two people I know named Bob, both have
> the same name but I know who I am addressing by looking at them.. I vote for
> 1 or NO tags... Its a symbolic mapping and that is only partially useful in
> the scheme of Visual Interface design...
> regards, The infoVision Folks ---- joseph altea infoVsion_AT_Cool.as
I agree with you with the current way. But once you got tagbars
you can edit directly, tagging will be a very easy task.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Mon Apr 10 2006 - 09:32:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:02:04 UTC